Darwin's Evolutionary Explanation Problem

Create Date: 27-May-2020

The Question that has no answer!

Last updated: 23-Jan-2021

A A A  help

 
Sections

1 The Problem 2 Whimsical Example
3 The Reasons for the Problem 4 Irreducible Complexity

The Problem

Those who argue in favor of evolution creating all life on any planet, have a problem that is never questioned, nor is it capable of being answered.  There is also another second question, of many more, that cannot have a logical answer.  The two first questions are:

  1. Where does the information come from to cause a design change inside a living organism?  
  2. How could heat, pressure and electricity, hitting inert mud/dirt suddenly create amino acids that somehow began a process to create a living cell?

In Darwin's book, "On the Origin of Species", and all modern-day Biologist / Anthropologist information do not have a truly logical explanation for any of these two questions.   There is always elaborate hypothesizes that contain a great deal of conjectures, which builds theories based on many levels of the hypothetical assertions.  When this occurs, how can it be stated as factual, provable and even tenable? 

Note that ALL of the theories of evolution involve one cell organisms and other creatures doing their own design changes to themselves to get more complex new features.  There are at least a few of the most brilliant recognized secular scientist in different scientific areas, who do not necessarily believe in God, have at least come out publicly and said evolution as we know it is incorrect, and the high probability is the Earth was seeded by an external source that is most likely extraterrestrial.  Click here for one example of many, many publications that are not Christian. 

Whimsical Example

Consider a primordial cell, that was created by:

  1. Mud being struck by lightning that then created amino acids,
  2. X-ray and UV radiation continued to supply energy for sustained changes.
  3. Amino acids then combined more with mud to become proteins. 
  4. The proteins then combined with more mud and amino acids to become a living cell of some kind.
  5. The living cell was composed of a membrane / cell wall, a stomach, a reproductive method, a brain, defense abilities, healing properties and so much more.

The primordial cell then decides it wants to be better so it creates a design document in its tiny brain to create more cells to handle and improve upon:

Rhetorically, can this even be conceivably possible and where did the five points and many other requirements come from?

The Reasons for the Problem

The reasons that the two questions, listed at the start of this topic, cannot be answered is an Evolutionist cannot explain the Origin of Life, nor the can the Evolutionist explain the Origin of external information that was required.  New enhancements to a biological creature, just like machines, would require at least the following five areas:

  1. Design,
  2. External biological components added,
  3. Some biological components removed,
  4. Some or all biological components changed,
  5. All biological areas implemented and added in a simultaneous transition as to not cause death.

Irreducible Complexity

Irreducible complexity argues and refutes the ability for random acts and changes to have created anything.  Information by an External Designer is always required.  When looking at any living creature, just like most machines, if we remove any biological component then the creature would be in a state that has limitations that can cause problems, and even death.  For more details read the topic on evolution.

What to read next?

See: (a) Time and Time Travel, (b) Time Domains, (c) Kingdom of God, (d) Singularity and the Big Bang Theories, (e) E=mc²,  (f) Ten Dimensions of the Universe, (g) Age of the Earth, Periods that Developed Life, Heavens, (h) Gap Theory of Genesis 1:2 - Earth formless for billions of years